<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The String Theory of Reference Interviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/the-string-theory-of-reference-interviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/the-string-theory-of-reference-interviews/</link>
	<description>the neverending reference interview of life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:38:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reference Singularity &#171; Agnostic, Maybe</title>
		<link>http://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/the-string-theory-of-reference-interviews/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Reference Singularity &#171; Agnostic, Maybe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 05:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/the-string-theory-of-reference-interviews/#comment-728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] have written about reference before in terms out how the interviews could possibly be measured (and maybe re-labeling reference service as an “information concierge”), but I had not really [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have written about reference before in terms out how the interviews could possibly be measured (and maybe re-labeling reference service as an “information concierge”), but I had not really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/the-string-theory-of-reference-interviews/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/the-string-theory-of-reference-interviews/#comment-156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it could be. They are certainly measurable in all aspects, including the patron impression (done after the fact). It really could be a model of analysis for how reference questions pan out, although it would be a very non-traditional layout. Length and width could be plotted just like their Cartesian counterparts, whereas height could be plotted in general terms such as general, specific, very specific. This would actually created a 3D object of what a reference interview looks like. Plotting this along the time line could show how it changes shape over time (based on number of places looked, searches done, etc. over time.) And, as suggested in the post, color could be used to describe positive/negative impressions from the patron.

Of course, this feels overcomplicated for this, but nothing math can&#039;t solve, right? =D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it could be. They are certainly measurable in all aspects, including the patron impression (done after the fact). It really could be a model of analysis for how reference questions pan out, although it would be a very non-traditional layout. Length and width could be plotted just like their Cartesian counterparts, whereas height could be plotted in general terms such as general, specific, very specific. This would actually created a 3D object of what a reference interview looks like. Plotting this along the time line could show how it changes shape over time (based on number of places looked, searches done, etc. over time.) And, as suggested in the post, color could be used to describe positive/negative impressions from the patron.</p>
<p>Of course, this feels overcomplicated for this, but nothing math can&#8217;t solve, right? =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather D.</title>
		<link>http://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/the-string-theory-of-reference-interviews/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heather D.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/the-string-theory-of-reference-interviews/#comment-155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting post! Thanks for sharing it. It can be hard to quantify the how/what/why of a reference interview, as well as how effective reference services are; maybe these five dimensions could be used in that way?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post! Thanks for sharing it. It can be hard to quantify the how/what/why of a reference interview, as well as how effective reference services are; maybe these five dimensions could be used in that way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
