<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beyond Content &amp; Container</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/beyond-content-container/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/beyond-content-container/</link>
	<description>the neverending reference interview of life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:03:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beyond Content &#38; Container &#171; Y&#039;s Guide: SLMPS</title>
		<link>http://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/beyond-content-container/#comment-5132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beyond Content &#38; Container &#171; Y&#039;s Guide: SLMPS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/beyond-content-container/#comment-5132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Beyond Content &amp; Container « Agnostic, Maybe. &#8220;Content versus container represents a constantly shifting dynamic in which works are judged on the merits of each. It is a “chicken or the egg” riddle for librarians going forward as the number of literacies and mediums continues to expand&#8230; [he then proposes adding two more elements to the conversation]  access and venue&#8230; placing them in this perspective can lend deeper insights into the changes in information mediums and expression. My hope would be that in plotting materials and services on such a graph that it would allow for better pattern recognition of community preferences and ongoing trends as clusters emerged. Perhaps then a better predictive model for information consumption would emerge, giving librarians better prognostication skills as technology and communication continue to evolve. &#8220; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Beyond Content &amp; Container « Agnostic, Maybe. &#8220;Content versus container represents a constantly shifting dynamic in which works are judged on the merits of each. It is a “chicken or the egg” riddle for librarians going forward as the number of literacies and mediums continues to expand&#8230; [he then proposes adding two more elements to the conversation]  access and venue&#8230; placing them in this perspective can lend deeper insights into the changes in information mediums and expression. My hope would be that in plotting materials and services on such a graph that it would allow for better pattern recognition of community preferences and ongoing trends as clusters emerged. Perhaps then a better predictive model for information consumption would emerge, giving librarians better prognostication skills as technology and communication continue to evolve. &#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glecharles</title>
		<link>http://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/beyond-content-container/#comment-5130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[glecharles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://agnosticmaybe.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/beyond-content-container/#comment-5130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fundamentally, I like this a lot, as it acknowledges the nuances that the black and white &quot;content vs. container&quot; debate often leaves out. I&#039;d probably tweak it slightly, rotating it 90 degrees counter-clockwise so &quot;Content&quot; is at the bottom, and would label the whole thing, &quot;CONTEXT IS QUEEN!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fundamentally, I like this a lot, as it acknowledges the nuances that the black and white &#8220;content vs. container&#8221; debate often leaves out. I&#8217;d probably tweak it slightly, rotating it 90 degrees counter-clockwise so &#8220;Content&#8221; is at the bottom, and would label the whole thing, &#8220;CONTEXT IS QUEEN!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
