Want to be a Subversive Librarian? Teach a Class!

For all the onerous topics that face the library, I believe that the best way to confront them is to teach our communities about them. I don’t believe that the public in general is apathetic to the issues that face libraries from publishers, content providers, and web companies; they just don’t know enough of the situation to consider involvement. I was reminded of Dave Meslin’s great (and short) TED talk on the barriers to involvement in politics. How can people know what is going on in the library or library issues if they don’t know how Overdrive operates, the terms under which databases provide access, or how social media generally funds their operations? Show them behind the curtain!

I teach all the computer classes at my library as well as offering help using the Overdrive system and our subscription databases. I tell people about the pro’s and con’s of sharing information on Facebook and Google and how they use any account information. I inform patrons that certain eBooks are not available because some publishers do not allow for library lending. I caution students and researchers that some of the results in a database search may have to be purchased unless it’s from an open access publication. For all the issues that I want the public to be informed of, I try to teach a class that relates to it or make it part of my reference desk repertoire.

For any who might be aghast at this suggestion or feel that I am acting out on behalf of an agenda rather than providing service, I should add a few things. First, teaching the class or skill comes first. When people leave the class or service desk, they know how to use Facebook, download books from Overdrive, or search the database. I’m not running a propaganda laden re-education camp in the computer lab or at the reference desk. Second, I am perfectly frank about the pros and cons of everything that the library offers. I don’t want them to discover something and have them come back with the accusation, “You never told me about this [glaring privacy invasion/hideous legal term of use/hidden huge cost]!”. I label all my personal opinions as such and offer both sides. Third, I emphasize that it is still up to them to make the decision. If I’m asked, I’ll tell them what I would do and why I would do it, but the decision is always theirs. Furthermore, I am still resolved to help them no matter what they choose.

Finally, I feel that the facts speak for themselves. Four of six major publishers do not allow for library eBook lending. As the newly coined saying goes, “If you’re not paying for it, you’re the product being sold” when it comes to internet or social media websites that collect personal information. There is academic research behind paywalls as well as open access resources that are equally credible and citable in papers. It’s a disservice to the community and to the profession to gloss over or dismiss some aspects in order to facilitate a happy-shiny-everything-is-rainbows-and-candy-here-in-the-library façade rather than confront the ugly (and sometimes uncomfortable) realities behind the goods and services people want to use. I am not in the turd polishing business. Quite frankly, given all of the spin that permeates our culture these days, a little candor goes a long way.

I believe there is nothing more subversive than an informed patron. So, go on. Teach a class.


*I will applaud Google and Facebook for simplifying their Privacy policy language, but they are still extremely verbose.

5 thoughts on “Want to be a Subversive Librarian? Teach a Class!

  1. I am in agreement with you. I find myself grinding my teeth over the “Big 6” issue, and I have found no better way of fighting back than through interacting with the patrons that I teach.

    My line?

    “If there’s a popular author, like Jodi Picoult or Jeffrey Archer, that you’re looking for on our Library’s Overdrive website, and you can’t find it, here’s the likely reason why: 4 out of the 6 big major publishers refuse to sell their eBooks to Libraries.”

    I usually try to refrain from editorializing further, but I’ll say this here: HELL yes I have an agenda. My agenda is the continued existence of libraries; my agenda is to incite these publishers to get off their duffs, grow a pair, and try to get a clue. If librarians can embrace eBooks and see them as a boon then by god, the publishers can, too, the bloody cowards.

    One of the patrons–a major donor, as it happened– that I taught stated, “If those publishers won’t sell eBooks to Libraries, I won’t buy eBooks from them.” Bless her heart, but it gave me an idea that kind of goes along with your post: perhaps advocating through libraries and the ALA and our various governing bodies is not the way to go. Perhaps we should be launching our campaign through our patrons…

    …Because OUR patrons are THEIR consumers, too.

  2. Pingback: Want to be a Subversive Librarian? Teach a Class! | Promoting Libraries | Scoop.it

  3. I really appreciate you saying this, Andy. We go a step farther and also tell people how they can help us, through donating, volunteering, patronizing, etc. I throw in the line about how it costs us more for ebooks than them. I tell them about why we might not have an ebook. Everytime I tell them this stuff, there are actual gasps from the participants. I started it because I got tired of libraries being demonized. (“Amazon doesn’t allow libraries to lend audiobooks for the Kindle; it’s not our policy.”) It has, I think, made for a better-informed public.

  4. FYI – On Wednesday, Mike Shatzkin took a step back and published a thoughtful post on the topic: Libraries and publishers don’t have symmetrical interest in a conversation.

    Because libraries are, at most 5% of a general trade publisher’s business and far less of the ebook business, and because the market is changing so rapidly and because every retailer except Amazon can be said to be struggling to carve out a sustainable position in the global ebook marketplace, there are many legitimate reasons for the biggest publishers to take a wait-and-see attitude about libraries and ebooks. […] Of course, libraries view this differently because the big books from the big publishers are a lot more than 5% of their patrons’ interest. This is an imbalance that would explain the difference in attitude of the parties, for anybody who cares to accept the reality of it. That is, the atavistic “instinct of self-preservation” leads libraries and publishers to somewhat different conclusions about what the best outcome would be and how quickly the industry should move to it.

  5. Pingback: The Global eBook Market: Current Conditions & Future Projections | WWW.PROINFOLIFE.NET

Share your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s